
Yes, this is another installment of "I can't believe some people are this desperate, greedy and whorish". No, my title is not referring to the 2000 Election and the now-insane Al Gore, driven mad by his razor thin loss after defeat was nailed to his forehead by the Supreme Court.
No, this Bush I'm talking about is the one who is on the edge of becoming the first person in the 75 year history of the Downtown Atheletic Club's Heisman Trophy to have it stripped away. Whether he deserves to or not is not my gripe. That's a different story. What I'm in disbelief over is that another team, another coach and another University are trying to use this scandal to pad the number of baubles in their Trophy Hall by adding Bush's potentially revoked Heisman to their own coffers. This is what full corked madness looks like, sports fans. Unbelievable.
Giving the award to Vince Young would be sad and pathetic. I know Mack Brown doesn't mind scraping his knees begging, cheating and lying for all the scraps he can get, but... this is just sad. Look, Reggie Bush was the best college football player in 2005, period end of story. Bush had 784 first-place Heisman votes while Vince Young only had 79. I don't care what happened off-field, on-field Bush ruled and Young was a distant second place to him and rightfully so. Bush was #1. Either let him keep it or void the year's winner.
Giving it to a second place loser sets up a dynamic that now, every time a player wins and another school doesn't like it, all they have to do is get an investigator to drudge up dirt and get him DQ'ed so their own player gets it. That's dangerous. That's why when championships or games are voided, there is no win shown, they don't gift the losing team the win...it opens a can of worms that can weave deep into past years. The only fair and logical thing to do is just void it. And frankly, to try to *win* the Heisman for a far distance second place finisher by disqualification is embarassing.
If V. Young or M. Brown had one iota of class they would refuse the award. The Heisman committee is right to say if it's taken it away no one gets it. For crying out loud, this isn't 3rd grade where the second place whiners get the award 5 years after the fact. It's over. In 2005 Bush was better, Bush beat Young in a landslide because he WAS the better player that year so Bush rightfully got the Heisman. For the DAC to take the award back is between Bush and the DAC. UT, Mack Brown and Vince Young have nothing to do with it and they're classless jerks to try to make the whole thing an excuse to chalk up another Heisman for UT.
How pathetic is it to celebrate that? "Ooh! We won by default 5 years later! Whee!" How sickening and sad. It does sound just like Mack Brown, though. If a National Champion team is declared to have violated rules and their championship is taken away, they don't call up the losing team and tell them they're now the champions. There simply is no champion that year. It's the only fair way. You don't give losers the trophy by default years after the issue is over, so why try to do it for an individual award? That's mentally ill. The only way to keep a lid on 'surprise' information that can knock teams or players out of awards or trophies is to just void the win. Period.
Hypothetical Question: If the NCAA retracted USC's National Championship from 2004 and gave it to Oklahoma (who USC crushed 55-19 in the Orange Bowl that year), would that make OU a legitimate National Champion? Would UT accept that OU now had another National Championship, raising their football championship total to 8? Twice that of UT's 4? Do you see the parallel? A clear cut winner demolishes his second place rival, but as the clouds of doubt reach to take away the title, the second placer (who got mercilessly crushed because they weren't even remotely competitive) now wants to be crowned champion as a result. Galactically moronic, profoundly unsportsmanlike and indescribably deceitful.
So back to my hypothetical; would Coach Mack and his Brown Cow Cult gleefully accept OU getting the big glass football trophy for an eighth time if USC was DQ'ed? Hell no, they wouldn't. They'd scream like Joe Perry after Steven Tyler agreed to be on American Idol. And they'd be right to. USC ripped OU apart in that game so no reasonable person would give the '04 crown to OU based on a disqualification. So why would giving the Heisman crown to Young after Bush is DQ'ed make any more sense? It doesn't. Making Vince Young the Heisman winner by Reggie Bush losing it is just as wrong.
Why is it so hard for UT fans to NOT filter everything through their over biased orange blooded cultism? Not everything in the universe is about the Longhorns or UT. Seriously, I've never seen a greedier, more self-obsessed culture than that sick, cow worshipping cabal in Austin.
OK, so you ask why the heck am I writing about 'em? Because I hate them. That's why. Sure, spending as much time as I do ripping on them is kind of sad and pathetic in it's own way too, I suppose. But what the heck, if anyone deserves it they do.
Besides, college football is one of these sports in which hating a team is almost as good as loving a team. So, rah rah rah!! Sis boom bah!! Stick a Heisman up Mack Brown's craw!
Yaaaaaay team!
xxxxxxx